Next: 2000-08-10: activation energy for
Up: Aliovalent cation doped ceria
Previous: 2000-07-31a: comparison with experimental
2000-08-04: ``Strict'' reproduction of Grimes' results:
i.e. using their potential parameters
Trying to reproduce Grimes' results (Minervini et al., 1999) using their
potential parameters.
I tried to calculate the formation energy for two point defects,
namely
and
in pure ceria. In
both cases, the calculations failed. In the case of
, the defect energy reached unreasonable values
after 5 iterations and was stopped. In the case of
,
GULP core dumped before starting the defect calculation.
Possible explanations:
- (Some of) the parameter values quoted in the paper are wrong
- CASCADE (used by Grimes) behaves differently from GULP